A cannon blast through the heart of all that is dead and decaying.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Face the Strange

I'm sitting here this morning with the words of Diamond Joe, sung by Ramblin' Jack by way of a Vanguard collection, which seems as fitting a soundtrack to this moment in American history as any, for Populism appears to be alive and well, to judge by the election returns.

After six years of wondering what paper this country was reading, I have regained some small measure of faith in my fellow country men and women. After all the lies, fabrications, back room dealings and bad cash changing hands, the American people finally stood up and said their will be no "full steam ahead" over our wishes--we will not be discounted from our own county's political processes.

But I caution the Democrats--this was far more a vote against the prevailing dynasty than a vote for you--do not let it delude you into thinking we will role over for you. And you had damn well do something constructive with the power with which you have been entrusted. It is a far easier thing to be the opposition than to lead (just ask Big Ian Paisley), and 2008 is not that far off. If you show that you are unworthy of the trust given to you, you can just as easily be voted out.

It seems one of the big treads of the conservative movement of the last decade or so is the rise of the so-called "Religious Right" within its big tent theatrics. I was brought up Lutheran (though no longer cling to any creed but my own). One good thing I can say about the Lutherans is that religion is a personal matter, not to be drugded up and dragged through the streets and gutters of the world. You profess your beliefs amongst a body of believers, and quietly live your beliefs within the greater world--professing through your actions, as it were. No soap boxes, no shrill screams of holy fire, and above all, no going off and mucking about in people's personal affairs.

Here in Wisconsin, we had one of the referendums on the definition of marriage. Many on the Right played it up as preserving the sanctity of marriage, as a repudiation of homosexual unions. But in reality, it went much further than that, actually chipping away at rights already in existence regarding civil unions.

I grew up in a fairly conservative household as well. And one of the things I grew up believing was that one of the foundations of conservatism was to keep government intervention out of the lives of the people (remember Barry Goldwater, anyone?)

I'm skiddish about labels. They have a way of painting you into uncomfortable corners. As things stand in this country today, I could not, in good conscious, call myself conservative or liberal.

Let's see where I stand though (as everyone has to stand somewhere). I believe that we humans (to use the Christian terminology) are stewards of the Earth, and have a responsibility to make sure we leave it at least in the same condition that we originally found it in. I believe in worker's rights (a living wage, health care, etc.). I believe responsible people have a right to gun ownership (and let me say that it is a Republican myth that most on the Left are for gun control--I have heard moderates to far Leftists who realize the value of gun ownership in a free society). I also believe that the government (whether Left or Right) has no right whatsoever in dictating to us how to live our personal lives. Which also means that I think cannabis users should have the same rights as alcohol and/or tobacco users. (Don't cops have better things to do anyway?) That simply is not part of their job. I also have no trust in large corporations and am very leery of capitalism. So I guess that leaves me somewhere to the right of Emma Goldman, but left of Harpo Marx. Which, I suppose, makes me a libertarian with a social conscious, meaning an anarchist. And that is all fine and good if I'd like to drink red wine with Noam Chomsky and discuss theoretic, but I am interested in what is progressive and works. And there is wherein the difficulty lies.

What I put to you who term yourselves conservatives is this--are you against government interference in the lives of individuals or are you for legislating morality? Or is it that you are against "big government" only when it's the other team in charge? Please tell me which, because I am a bit confused on this matter.

Anyway, it is November 8, 2006, and we're still knee deep in big muddy.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home